Aider

Dr. Igor Cernavin - director

Dr George Alexopoulos - director

Ruth Alima � manager and course coordinator

Dr Igor Cernavin: Prosthodontist, Director and Co-founder of AIDER

Dr Cernavin graduated with a Bachelor of Dental Surgery degree from the University of Adelaide in 1972, and a Master of Dental Science Degree from the University of Melbourne in 1992 with a specialist qualification in prosthodontics. He is a registered specialist prosthodontist in private practice in Melbourne.

He is also an honorary senior fellow of the school of Dental Science, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences at the University of Melbourne where he currently holds a position of clinical demonstrator. He has been an examiner for ADC in restorative dentistry for the last 15 years, as well as an external examiner for final year students. He lectures in Restorative Dentistry for the OTC course.

Dr Cernavin is a recognized Australian Authority on Lasers in Dentistry, has presented lectures to undergraduate and postgraduate dental students and bioengineering students on Lasers in Dentistry, as well as run continuing education courses on these and other topics including implants, dental materials, clinical and aesthetic aspects of dentistry and medico-legal aspects of dental treatment. He has lectured at scientific meetings in Australia, USA, Japan and various Asian countries presenting the results of his research as well as chaired clinical and scientific sessions and served on various committees and International Bodies. He has also been asked to review articles for publication in journals and marked higher degree theses. He is currently the Australian representative for the International Society of Lasers in Dentistry.

Dr Cernavin is the chairman of the Defence Committee (Victorian Branch), and has published in refereed and non-refereed journals on the results of his research, on prosthodontics, clinical matters pertaining to dentistry, air abrasion and medico-legal matters.

Dr George Alexopoulos : Director and Co-founder of AIDER

Dr George Alexopoulos graduated with a Bachelor of Dental Science (BDSc.) from The University of Melbourne in 1997. In 1998, he held the position of rresident (oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry) at Monash Medical Centre. Since then, he has practiced general dentistry in both public and private sectors. Between 2004 and 2006, Dr Alexopoulos was Head of the Bridging Program for Overseas Trained Dentists which was conducted by Dental Health Services Victoria at the Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne. In 2003, Dr Alexopoulos completed a Masters in Business Administration (MBA) from Monash University. He currently holds a Business Development Management role with Dentsply Australia.

Ruth Alima : Manager and Coordinator of AIDER courses

Ruth Alima has had in excess of 30 years experience as a dental nurse both in the private and public sectors. For the past seven years she has been involved specifically in the training of overseas dentists wishing to sit for their qualifying examination at the Royal Dental Hospital, Melbourne. Her duties included training candidates in infection control, communication skills required in a clinical environment, preparation for the Part 3 Clinical Qualifying Examination as well as other areas. Ruth brings invaluable skills and knowledge of ADC examination requirements to the AIDER course.

Recommended Reading

This list is based on the recommended reading list provided to 4th and 5th year dental students at Melbourne University as candidates are expected to achieve clinical and didactic skills equivalent to an Australian graduating dental student.

1. Ailor JE, Jr. Managing incomplete tooth fractures J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:1168-1174.

2. Anderson MH, Bales DJ, Omnell K-A. Modern management of dental caries; the cutting edge is not the dental bur. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:37-44.

3. Bjorndal L, Mjor IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 4: Dental caries �characteristics of lesions and pulpal reactions. Quint Int. 2001 Oct;32(9):717-36 Review.

4. Bryant RW. Direct posterior composite resin restorations. A review. 1. Factors influencing case selection. Aust Dent J 1992;37:81-87.

5. Bryant RW. Direct posterior composite resin restorations. A review. 2. Clinical technique. Aust Dent J 1992;37:161-171.

6. Burgess JO. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries. Am J Dent 1995;8:342-351.

7. Costa CAS, Hebling J, Hanks CT. Current status of pulp capping with dentin adhesive systems: A review Dental Materials 2000;16:188-197.

8. Dodes JE. The amalgam controversy. An evidence-based analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:348-356.

9. Erhmann EH, Tyas MJ. Cracked tooth syndrome: diagnosis, treatment and correlation between symptoms and post-extraction findings. Aust Dent J 1990;35:105-112.

10. Erickson RL, Glasspoole EA. Model investigations of caries inhibition by fluoride-releasing dental materials. Advances in Dental Research 1995;9:315-323.

11. Fontana M and Gonzales-Cabezas C. Secondary caries and restoration replacement: An unresolved problem. Compendium 2000;21:15-27.

12. Grippo JO. Abfractions; a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esth Dent 1991;3:14-19.

13. Hassall DC, Mellor AC. The sealant restoration: Indications, success and clinical technique. Brit Dent J 2001;191:358-62.

14. Heyeraas KJ, Sveen OB, Mjor IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 3: Pulpal inflammation and its sequelae. Quint Int. 2001 Sept;32(8):611-25. Review.

15. Hunt PR. Rational cavity design principles. J Esth Dent 1994;6:245-256.

16. Jacob RF, Carr AB. Hierarchy of research design used to categorize the �strength of evidence� in answering clinical dental questions. J Pros Dent 2000;83:137-152.

17. Kugel G Perry R. Direct composite resins: an update. Compendium 2002;23:593-604. 18. Levitch L, Bader J, Shugars D, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195-207.

19. Liebenberg W. The fissure sealant impasse. Quint Int1994;25:741-745.

20. McGione P, Watt R and Sheiham A. Evidence-based dentistry: An overview of the challenges in changing professional practice British Dental Journal 2001;190:636-639.

21. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quint Int 1994;25:587-589.

22. McLean JW. Dentinal bonding agents versus glass-ionomer cements. Quint Int 1996;27:659-667.

23. McLean JW. The failed restoration: causes of failure and how to prevent them. Int Dent J 1990;40:345-358.

24. Mjor IA, Ferrari M. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 6: Reactions to restorative materials, tooth-restoration interfaces, and adhesive techniques. Quint Int 2002 Jan;33(1):35-63. Review.

25. Mjor IA, Sveen OB, HeyeraasKJ. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 1: normal structure and physiology. Quint Int 2001 Jun;32(6):427-46. Review.

26. Mjor IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 7: The exposed pulp. Quint Int 2002 Feb;32(2):113-35. Review.

27. Mjor IA. Current views on biological testing of restorative materials. J Oral Rehab 1990;17:503-507.

28. Mount GJ. Glass ionomers: a review of their current status. Oper Dent 1999;24:115-124.

29. Mount GJ. Clinical placement of modern glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry. Quint Int 1993;24:99-107.

30. Randall RC, Wilson NHF. Glass-ionomer restoratives: a systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999;78:628-637.

31. Nicholson JW, Croll Theodore P. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry. Quint Int 1997;28:705-714.

32. Pashley DH. Clinical considerations in microleakage. J Endod 1990;16:70-77.

33. Ricketts D. Management of the deep carious lesion and the vital pulp dentine complex. BDJ 2001; 191:606-610.

34. Ripa LW, Wolff MS. Preventive resin restorations; techniques and success. Quint Int 1992;23:307-315.

35. Rowe AHR, Pitt-Ford TR. The assessment of pulpal vitality. Int Endo J 1990;23:77-83.

36. Ruse ND. What is a �compomer�? J Can Dent Assoc 1999;65:500-504.

37. Setcos J, Staninec M, Wilson HNF. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects. Oper Dent 2000;25:121-129.

38. Sidhu SK. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1995;8:59-67.

39. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. J Amer Dent Assoc 1991;122(10):34-42.

40. Smales RJ and Wetherell JD. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in general practice over five years. Oper Dent 2000;25:374-381.

41. Stanley HR. Biological evaluation of dental materials. Int Dent J 1992;42:37-46.

42. Surmont P, Martens L, D�Hauwers R. A decision tree for the treatment of caries in posterior teeth. Quint Int 1990;21:239-246.

43. Swift EJ. Bonding to enamel and dentin; a brief history and state of the art. Quint Int 1995;26:95-110.

44. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frenken JE, Mount G. Minimal intervention dentistry � a review. Inter Dent J 2000;50:1-12.

45. Wahl MJ. Amalgam-resurrection and redemption. Part 1: The clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam. Quint Int 2001;32:525-535.

46. Walsh LJ. Preventive dentistry for the general dental practitioner. Aust Dent J 2000;45:76-82.

47. Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ. The residual caries dilemma. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1999;27:436-41.

48. White JM, Eakle WS. Rationale and treatment approach in minimally invasive dentistry. JADA 2000;131(Supp):13S-19S.

49. Gutteridge DL, Cassidy M. An update on conventional fixed bridges part1: Patient assessment and selection. Dental Update 1994 April;110-243.

50. Cassidy M, Gutteridge DL. An update on conventional fixed bridgework part4: clinical technique. Dental Update 1994 Oct;316-21.

51. Bartlett DW. Ricketts DNJ, Fisher NZ. Management of the short clinical crown by indirect restorations. Dental Update 1997 December; 431-436.

52. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative materials: A review.Aust Dent J 2004;49:(3):112-121.

8 WEEK STRUCTURED PROGRAM

The 8 week program is an intensive program, which is designed to assist students with their preparations for the Australian Dental Council clinical examinations. The program covers most disciplines that are likely to be examined.

It runs for eight consecutive weeks, from Monday to Friday. Three sessions (morning, afternoon, and evening) are conducted on each of Monday through to Thursday, whilst two sessions are held on Fridays (morning and afternoon). Sessions may be held on Saturdays if necessary, depending on demonstrator/tutor availability during the week.

The program is limited to pre-clinical activities, seminars, and tutorials.

Cancellation/Refund Policy:

Given the limited number of pre-clinical program places available, it is important that you provide AIDER with as much warning as possible if you will not be accepting an offer. This will enable AIDER to make an offer to another interested candidate.
Many of the costs for running a program are fixed (i.e. demonstrator fees, tutor fees, etc.), and hence students canceling at short notice, or failing to meet the required payments, will be placing undue financial pressures on AIDER. The relatively low fees can only be maintained if all enrolled candidates complete the program with all of the necessary payments made on time.
For this reason, if a student cancels their position two weeks or more prior to the commencement of a program, a 10% administrative fee will be incurred. If a student cancels their position within two weeks of commencement of a program, a 15% administrative fee will be incurred. If a student pulls out during a program, they will not receive a refund for the funds already paid. Students cannot withdraw part way through a program and hope to complete the remaining weeks on another program. A new enrollment will be required, and full program fees will apply.

What is included/provided?

� Attendance and participation in all rostered sessions
� Use of the pre-clinical training facility during rostered times
� Use of a restorative manikin head
� Use of high and low speed handpieces
� Use of a radiology manikin head
� Use of a restorative, endodontic, periodontal, and rubber dam kits
� Basic consumables required to undertake pre-clinical tasks
� Appropriate dental materials (i.e. amalgam, resin composite, glass ionomer cement, etc.)
� Short-sleeve clinical gowns
� Access to a seminar/tutorial room
� Access to a simple kitchen and tea room
� Notes of tutorials/seminars (subject to tutors/demonstrators giving AIDER permission to make copies of presentations)
� Scientific articles recommended by tutors/demonstrators that AIDER can access

What is not included?

� Manikin jaws and cheek. These can be purchased from AIDER for a price of $450 which includes GST and a set of 28 melamine teeth for use in pre-clinic tasks. The jaws and cheek will remain the property of the candidate, and can be taken upon completion of the course. The jaws can be of future use in clinical practice as a tool for demonstrating oral hygiene care. If the candidate has the misfortune of not passing the final ADC examinations, the model can be reused to attend supplementary practice sessions.
� Manikin teeth. These can be purchased from AIDER as required. The cost of the teeth will depend on the type of tooth required (i.e. melamine, dentine-enamel, carious tooth, pulpotomy tooth, endodontic simulated tooth, etc.). Please enquire with AIDER regarding prices.
� Natural teeth for endodontic treatment. This will need to be arranged by the candidate (i.e. by asking practicing colleagues to collect teeth for them). AIDER will provide , and plaster pour-up facilities to mount the teeth. All natural teeth should have been soaked in sodium hypochlorite for a minimum of 48 hours prior to use in the pre-clinic.
� Dental Burs. Given the large range of burs available, and the different preferences candidates have for burs, it is up to them to decide what burs they would like to use. AIDER will have a selection of burs on stock that students can purchase. Candidates are also free to make their own arrangements with other dental bur suppliers.

Safety

It is important that candidates take reasonable and appropriate care in ensuring their own safety and that of fellow candidates and AIDER staff.
� Safety glasses should be worn at all times when undertaking pre-clinical tasks. The glasses must meet the required Australian Standards and should not allow objects (i.e. burs, amalgam, etc.) to be able to reach the eyes.
� Burs should be removed from handpieces if they will be unattended for some time.
� Any water leaks or fluid spillages should be immediately reported to an AIDER staff member.
� No running or rough behaviour is permitted on the AIDER premises.

Behaviour

AIDER�s aim is to assist dental professionals to achieve their goal of practicing dentistry in Australia. Candidates will be treated with respect and as the professionals they are. Respect however, is a two way street. AIDER staff and fellow candidates must also be treated appropriately.
The ADC examinations are not a contest between candidates, but rather a test of an individual candidate�s skills and knowledge (passing of the ADC examinations is not quota based, it is based on meeting minimum required standards). AIDER encourages a team approach to learning and candidates will benefit from exchanging ideas with fellow students who may have varying levels of clinical experience and educational backgrounds.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

AIDER employs/contracts a range of tutors and demonstrators with extensive teaching experience many of whom have themselves gone through the ADC accreditation process. When staff design seminars/tutorials and supervise pre-clinical sessions, they work on the following briefs provided by the ADC:

� �The ADC examination is a screening examination to establish that dentists trained in dental schools which have not been formally reviewed and accredited by the ADC, other than graduates of NZ, UK and the Republic of Ireland dental schools, have the necessary knowledge and clinical competence to practise dentistry with safety in the Australian community." www.dentalcouncil.net.au/adcmajoractivities.html
� �You will be examined at a level no less than that reached by graduates from Australian universities." www.dentalcouncil.net.au/dentistryinaust.html

Due to the broadness of the briefs above, and the fact that dentistry is both an art and a science, AIDER cannot guarantee that all of the information/advice given by tutors/demonstrators is accepted by the ADC. The content of information provided throughout the course will be based as much as possible on evidence based principles, and candidates are encouraged to prepare for the exams in a way that they can substantiate their answers/claims based on accepted scientific evidence. The way information provided by tutors/demonstrators of AIDER is used is up to the discretion of the candidate. Simply undertaking this pre-clinical program does not necessarily guarantee success; a range of factors will determine the final outcome, such as: the quality of undergraduate education, prior clinical experience, and the quality and quantity of ongoing study.